Your survey says 92% of users love the redesign. It was shown in-app, to people still using the app.
Asking people in the queue whether the queue is too long. Everyone who gave up and left isn't there to answer.
More data doesn't fix it — a million biased responses give you a very precise estimate of the wrong thing.
Every number you compute describes the rows you have, and the question is always whether those rows represent the population you mean. Selection bias is the systematic gap between the two, and it does not go away with more data — a million responses from a biased sample give you a precise estimate of the wrong thing. The classic shapes recur endlessly: survivorship (you only measure who stayed), non-response (unhappy users don't answer), self-selection (opt-in beta users are enthusiasts), and truncation (the analysis window quietly excludes the slow cases).
Selection bias is a systematic difference between who you measured and who you meant. More data doesn't fix it — it just makes the wrong estimate tighter. Watch for survivorship (only measuring who stayed), non-response (who answered differs from who didn't), self-selection (opt-in samples are enthusiasts), and truncation (the window excludes slow outcomes).
What is Selection Bias | Explained in 2 min — Productivity Guy, 2:18